For decades, the official narrative has bombarded us with a terrifying vision: viruses are omnipotent entities, capable of jumping from one individual to another at the slightest proximity and even from animals to humans. But what happens when science tries to prove this “truth” in a rigorous and controlled way, far from abstract mathematical models? The house of cards collapses miserably.
Today we analyse a study (yet another) that represents a tombstone on the simplistic conception of influenza contagion: the work conducted by Jonathan Van-Tam in 2013, published in PLOS Pathogens. An experiment that deserves to be discussed in every medical school, but which lies submerged by the silence of academic dogma.
THE EXPERIMENT: WHEN REALITY CONTRADICTS DOGMA
The EMIT-1 (Evaluating Modes of Influenza Transmission) study was designed to observe the transmission of the H1N1 virus in a controlled environment. The methodology was, on paper, foolproof:
A. Fifty-two “donors” were recruited and intentionally inoculated with the influenza virus.
B. These subjects were placed in close proximity to 75 healthy “recipients” in a confined environment.
C. Conditions were designed to maximise contagion: shared spaces, prolonged interactions and constant monitoring.
The result? A total failure for proponents of the classical theory. Despite forced proximity, transmission between subjects was exactly ZERO. No healthy person became ill. No PCR swabs tested positive (for what it’s worth).
THE TERRAIN IS EVERYTHING, THE MICROBE IS NOTHING
If the virus were really the “monster” described by the media, how can this outcome be explained? The authors attempt to save face by talking, as they have done before, about “ventilation of premises”, an explanation that borders on the ridiculous. If a ventilated room is enough to eliminate the infectious power of a virus that is supposed to paralyse the world, then the entire management of health emergencies should be called into question.
The truth is different: health is not a game of chance. It is not the seed (the virus) that determines the disease, but the terrain (the host) and the surrounding environment. Modern virology systematically ignores the factors that make an organism invulnerable.
IN CONCLUSION: CONTAGION AND VIROLOGY ARE UNCONTESTABLE DOGMAS EVEN WITH EVIDENCE LIKE THIS
Viruses have never been isolated and are invisible.
Artificial light, on the other hand, is VISIBLE, and no one talks about its damage to human, animal and plant health.
STUDY REFERENCE: Van-Tam JN, et al. (2013). PLOS Pathogens.
https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1008704