Separated by over a century, two Miltons grappled with uncertainty about influenza transmission: in both cases, experiments never succeeded in reproducing human-to-human spread, directly challenging the germ “theory” of disease. When a hypothesis fails the same test for over 100 years, it’s not “evolving science.” It’s an assumption protected from falsification.

di V NENPubblicato il Nessun commento

My latest article breaks down the January 2026 failure to demonstrate human-to-human transmission: https://viroliegynewsletter.substack.com/p/zero-transmission-an-inconvenient

Dr. Tau Braun (@drtaubraun) on X: There is no novel virus called SARS-CoV-2

di V NENPubblicato il I commenti sono disabilitati

There is no novel virus called SARS-CoV-2. SARS-CoV-2 is a hypothetical sequence generated through lab work. The hypothetical sequences was loaded to the GenBank server by Dr. Lili Ren. Dr. Ren is connected to Fauci’s NIAID and Ecohealth Alliance through grants. The sequence was retracted and replaced with additional hypothetical sequences that NIH, BARDA, and …

Leggi tutto “Dr. Tau Braun (@drtaubraun) on X: There is no novel virus called SARS-CoV-2”

After 17 weeks of complete isolation, a wave of colds broke out at the Antarctic station. Who actually infected the team? Or were the pathogens simply dormant and prevailed after the bodies weakened?

di V NENPubblicato il I commenti sono disabilitati

Context: The ideology of “pandemic preparedness” is based on the idea that people are effectively healthy and only become ill because of infection. If they are protected from contact with others through lockdowns, school closures and curfews, then everyone will remain healthy. This case study suggests that things are more complicated than that. Even without …

Leggi tutto “After 17 weeks of complete isolation, a wave of colds broke out at the Antarctic station. Who actually infected the team? Or were the pathogens simply dormant and prevailed after the bodies weakened?”